Luhrmann chose to keep Shakespeare's original dialog, but decided to
change the dialect of the Elizabethan times to the more moden American voice. His main focus was to change the
play into a movie that appeals to today's audience. In choosing Danes and
DeCaprio he succeeded at getting young America's attention. The setting is where
he did most of the modernizing. He took the situation from the original play and
translated those to the situations that they most closely resembled today. "Fair
Verona" turned from town controlled by elites, to town controlled by rival gangs,
the Montagues and Capulets. The members of the gangs carried guns with brand
names like "dagger" and "sword". When Romeo sees Juliet for the first time he is
tripping, (love potion turned to little white pill). Mercutio kind of threw me
for a loop. I felt like I was watching an episode of Jerry Springer. Romeo's best
friend is a black drag queen. I can only attribute this to
Luhrmann's, like Shakespeare's, need for shock value.
So instead of sitting at home reading Romeo and Juliet, we are at the
theaters being visually stimulated by this wonderful remake. But what makes it
so great? Not everyone in the "New Generation" relates to being torn between
love and remaining loyal to their gang. The thing that I think we can relate to
the most is the fact that we like seeing violence and dysfunction in a Pulp
Fictionisc style.
I can not deny that the play has many parallels to today's problems.
Look at how easy it was to make a few changes to the setting and there you have
it, corrupt America, 1996, overcome with crime stemming from gang activity and
hate. I have to say that all of this works. The themes of Romeo and Juliet
written four hundred years ago are very relevant today. Shakespeare's works have
been called "Universal", because what he wrote so long ago still speaks to us
today. And I definitely agree that Romeo and Juliet falls into this category.
Lauren Fox